Following the tragic death of an eight-year-old boy who was struck by a snowmobile driven by an intoxicated driver, lawmakers have introduced a bill increasing penalties for drunk driving regardless of the vehicle which includes revoking driving privileges from all types of vehicles for individuals who are convicted of a DWI.

Back in 2015, California lawmakers introduced Assembly Bill 1356 to enable law enforcement officers to use new technology to identify drugged drivers. Under California’s implied consent law, anyone with a driver’s license has given their consent to chemical testing of their blood and/or oral fluids.
Following intense debate, back in 2016, the Minnesota legislature unanimously approved a bill that overhauled state drug laws in order to help addicts seek treatment and target “kingpin” dealers. At the heart of the discussion was the fact that lawmakers believed that the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission’s recommendations went too far.
Everyday there is news about alcohol-related traffic accidents and fatalities. Such tragedies underscore the necessity of strengthening existing laws; however, they also highlight the fact that even stronger laws might not create the desired results as many states continue to suffer from a high number of such accidents.
Drug possession is a serious crime, especially in Minnesota. Simply having drugs in your control—whether or not they are in your system—is enough to trigger grave and life-changing charges.
Drugged driving is a growing public safety concern. According to the NHTSA, each year,
When a law enforcement officers witnesses a driver and has reason to suspect that s/he is intoxicated or under the influence of drugs, a DWI investigation commences. Said investigation must adhere to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) protocols including three specific phases through which all DWI investigations proceed.
The news and literature are rife with data regarding the effects of alcohol intoxication and how they negatively impact one’s ability to drive. It is also well known that the amount of alcohol necessary to cause these effects—one’s tolerance—differs by person. Additional factors behind intoxication include the amount of food in one’s stomach, how quickly the alcohol was consumed, one’s sex, and one’s size. Because of these differences, lawmakers have come up with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) measurement to assess whether someone is legally intoxicated. In the U.S., this legal limit is .08 percent of alcohol in one’s bloodstream (although Utah is considering lowering this to .05.) This is referred to as the per se level and is central to many DWI laws across the country. In other words, if an individual is caught driving and has a BAC of at least .08, s/he is considered guilty of DWI regardless of his/her actual impairment, if any.
Being convicted of a DWI can change several aspects of one’s life dramatically—from serving jail time, losing driving privileges, dealing with increased insurance rates, and potentially losing one’s vehicle, for example. People who are in the country illegally could face even more serious problems including possible deportation.
It is common knowledge that alcohol and drugs affect driving. I have already posted a piece on 




